Mazzi v. State

212 So. 3d 472, 2017 WL 621245, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 2017
DocketNo. 3D16-2253
StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 3d 472 (Mazzi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mazzi v. State, 212 So. 3d 472, 2017 WL 621245, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for attachment of records conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief or an evidentiary hearing. Langdon v. State, 947 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langdon v. State
947 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 So. 3d 472, 2017 WL 621245, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazzi-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.