Mazzeo v. Tizes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mazzeo v. Tizes

47 A.D.2d 674, 366 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 674 (Mazzeo v. Tizes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mazzeo v. Tizes, 47 A.D.2d 674, 366 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated December 5, 1973, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and (2) as limited by plaintiff’s brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, entered April 8, 1974, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Order entered April 8, 1974 affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order dated December 5, 1973 dismissed as moot. This order was superseded by the order entered April 8, 1974. Respondents are awarded one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated December 5, 1973, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and (2) as limited by plaintiff’s brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, entered April 8, 1974, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Order entered April 8, 1974 affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order dated December 5, 1973 dismissed as moot. This order was superseded by the order entered April 8, 1974. Respondents are awarded one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 674, 366 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazzeo-v-tizes-nyappdiv-1975.