MAZZARELLA, JOHN v. SYRACUSE DIOCESE
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1020 CA 11-02536 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
JOHN MAZZARELLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS FATHER OF FOUR MINOR CHILDREN OF AGES 5, 7, 9, AND 11, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SYRACUSE DIOCESE, BISHOP JAMES M. MOYNIHAN, BISHOP THOMAS J. COSTELLO AND FR. JOHN W. BRODERICK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
JEFF ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES PA, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA, THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (MAUREEN E. MANEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS SYRACUSE DIOCESE, BISHOP JAMES M. MOYNIHAN AND BISHOP THOMAS J. COSTELLO.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered July 18, 2011. The order directed the disclosure to plaintiff of certain documents after an in camera review.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Mazzarella v Syracuse Diocese ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 9, 2012]).
Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MAZZARELLA, JOHN v. SYRACUSE DIOCESE (MAZZARELLA, JOHN v. SYRACUSE DIOCESE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.