Mazzara v. Town of Pittsford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mazzara v. Town of Pittsford

30 A.D.2d 634, 290 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1968

DocketNo. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 634 (Mazzara v. Town of Pittsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mazzara v. Town of Pittsford, 30 A.D.2d 634, 290 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The function of the note of issue and certificate of readiness is to give assurance that only those eases are on the Trial Calendar which are ready for trial, hence all pretrial procedures must be completed or waived. The plaintiff did not waive his right .to an examination before trial and his motion to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness should be granted since the case at that point was not ready for trial and should not have been on the Trial Calendar. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying motion to vacate statement of readiness.) Present— Williams, P. J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The function of the note of issue and certificate of readiness is to give assurance that only those eases are on the Trial Calendar which are ready for trial, hence all pretrial procedures must be completed or waived. The plaintiff did not waive his right .to an examination before trial and his motion to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness should be granted since the case at that point was not ready for trial and should not have been on the Trial Calendar. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying motion to vacate statement of readiness.) Present— Williams, P. J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 634, 290 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazzara-v-town-of-pittsford-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack