Mazzamuto v. Harilai

226 A.D.2d 352, 640 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated November 22, 1994, which granted the [353]*353defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint since the plaintiff failed to present any evidence demonstrating that the defendant created the defective condition on the public sidewalk or caused the defect to occur because of some special use (see, Nuesi v City of New York, 205 AD2d 370; Noto v Mermaid Rest, 156 AD2d 435, 436). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazzamuto v. Harilai, 226 A.D.2d 352, 640 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 352 (Mazzamuto v. Harilai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noto v. Mermaid Restaurant
156 A.D.2d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Nuesi v. City of New York
205 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)