Mazza v. Kensington Water Co.
This text of 9 A.2d 620 (Mazza v. Kensington Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The six Judges who heard the re-argument being equally divided, the judgment * of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Order, upon petition for reargument:
And now, to wit, this 19th day of December, 1939, all of the Judges who heard this case upon consideration of it are of one mind that a reargument should be refused and the judgment of the Superior Court affirmed. The petition for reargument is therefore refused.
Reported in 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 599.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.2d 620, 337 Pa. 264, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazza-v-kensington-water-co-pa-1939.