Mazza v. House Craft, LLC

22 A.3d 820, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 374, 2011 WL 2847121
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2011·No. 09-CV-1068·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*821 ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of appellant’s consent motion to vacate this court’s opinion issued on April 28, 2011, as moot, and the motion of the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. and Public Justice, P.C., for leave to file the lodged brief as amici curiae, and on further consideration of this court’s order filed May 17, 2011, denying appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot; and it appearing that this case was settled by the parties, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s consent motion to vacate opinion is granted and this court’s opinion issued on April 28, 2011, is hereby vacated as moot since this case was settled by the parties prior to the issuance of the court’s April 28, 2011, opinion, and the mandate issued on May 20, 2011, is hereby recalled. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that this court’s order of May 17, 2011, is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. and Public Justice, P.C., for leave to file the lodged brief as amici curiae is denied as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall reissue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazza v. House Craft, LLC, 22 A.3d 820, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 374, 2011 WL 2847121 (D.C. 2011).

22 A.3d 820 (Mazza v. House Craft, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP
68 A.3d 697 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Potomac Development Corp. v. District of Columbia
28 A.3d 531 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)