Mazza v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BRIDGETON

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Mazza v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BRIDGETON

219 A.2d 615, 47 N.J. 161, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 199

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 9, 1966·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

In this matter which was certified for disposition by us, the municipality granted a zoning variance to authorize construction of a garden apartment on land zoned against such structures. During pendency of the appeal the city amended the zoning ordinance in such fashion that garden apartments became a permitted use in the zone where the property in question is located. Under the circumstances, on the record before us the issue is moot, and therefore the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Ekanbis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino. — 0.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

In this matter which was certified for disposition by us, the municipality granted a zoning variance to authorize construction of a garden apartment on land zoned against such structures. During pendency of the appeal the city amended the zoning ordinance in such fashion that garden apartments became a permitted use in the zone where the property in question is located. Under the circumstances, on the record before us the issue is moot, and therefore the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Ekanbis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino. — 0.

Opposed — None.

Mazza v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BRIDGETON, 219 A.2d 615, 47 N.J. 161, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1966).

Pincite

219 A.2d 615 (Mazza v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BRIDGETON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related