Mazza v. Am. Continental Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Mazza v. Am. Continental Ins. Co.

99 Ohio St. 3d 1461

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 3, 2003

Docket2003-0510

StatusPublished

This text of 99 Ohio St. 3d 1461 (Mazza v. Am. Continental Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mazza v. Am. Continental Ins. Co., 99 Ohio St. 3d 1461 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 21192, 2003-0hio-360. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law I and II only. Proposition of Law I is held for the decision in 2002-0610, Geren v. Westfield Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-01-1398, 2002-0hio-1230; Proposition of Law II is held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Discretionary cross-appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 21192, 2003-0hio-360. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law I and II only. Proposition of Law I is held for the decision in 2002-0610, Geren v. Westfield Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-01-1398, 2002-0hio-1230; Proposition of Law II is held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Discretionary cross-appeal denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Ohio St. 3d 1461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazza-v-am-continental-ins-co-ohio-2003.