Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin

261 A.D.2d 546, 687 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated May 13, 1997, affirming a decision of the Borough Commissioner denying permission to erect a sign advertising cigarettes at certain premises, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated February 23, 1998, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The resolution of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591; Matter of Montalhano v Silva, 204 AD2d 457). S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin, 261 A.D.2d 546, 687 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 546 (Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Srinivasan
110 A.D.3d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Infinity Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New York
165 F. Supp. 2d 403 (E.D. New York, 2001)