Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin

261 A.D.2d 546, 687 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 546 (Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mazza & Avena, Inc. v. Chin, 261 A.D.2d 546, 687 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated May 13, 1997, affirming a decision of the Borough Commissioner denying permission to erect a sign advertising cigarettes at certain premises, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated February 23, 1998, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The resolution of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591; Matter of Montalhano v Silva, 204 AD2d 457). S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated May 13, 1997, affirming a decision of the Borough Commissioner denying permission to erect a sign advertising cigarettes at certain premises, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated February 23, 1998, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The resolution of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591; Matter of Montalhano v Silva, 204 AD2d 457). S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 546, 687 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazza-avena-inc-v-chin-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack