Mazyck v. Birt
This text of 4 S.C.L. 155 (Mazyck v. Birt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the whole court, except Waties and Bay, Justices. Miller’s title appears to have been complete to the land occupied by him by possession under the limitation act, which was enough to bar the plaintiff’s right to recover, as he lost his title to the land acquired by Miller. The plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title ; and it was only necessary to prove a better title in some other. The verdict appears to have been against law and evidence, and ought not to stand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.C.L. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazyck-v-birt-sc-1807.