Mazur v. Woodson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 15, 2001
• Docket: 01-2017
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2017

PAUL MAZUR; PAUL W. MAZUR; DEBORAH A. MAZUR SILVA; WALTER E. MAZUR, Appearing pro se for themselves and on behalf of Betty Dean Woodson Mazur, a mental incompetent,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

VICTORIA M. MAZUR,

Plaintiff,

versus

L. V. WOODSON; CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG AND COUNTY OF JAMES CITY; JUDGE WILLIAM LEE PERSON, JR.; STATE OF VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-3-4)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Mazur, Paul W. Mazur, Deborah A. Mazur Silva, Walter E. Mazur, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Roy Papile, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, Newport News, Virginia; Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on

their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Mazur v. Woodson, No. CA-01-3-4 (E.D. Va. July

30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED