Mazur v. Trinity Area School District

941 A.2d 1256, 596 Pa. 206
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 2, 2008·No. Appeal Nos. 298 WAL 2007, 299 WAL 2007, 300 WAL 2007, 301 WAL 2007, 302 WAL 2007, 303 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issues [207]*207set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the Court has jurisdiction to review municipal decisions approving a TIF District supported by public funds?
(2) Whether Plaintiffs’ allegations that the defendants made findings of blight in bad faith, are sufficient to withstand a demurrer?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazur v. Trinity Area School District, 941 A.2d 1256, 596 Pa. 206 (Pa. 2008).

941 A.2d 1256 (Mazur v. Trinity Area School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mazur v. TRINITY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
941 A.2d 1256 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)