Mazur, Et Vir v. Ake, Et Vir Mazur v. Ake, Et Vir

3 So. 2d 121, 147 Fla. 512, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1309
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 17, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Adams, Circuit Judge:

These are companion cases with those of Polly Kozak and her husband, John Kosak, v. Mittie Ake and her husband, Forrest H. Ake, and John Kosak vs. Mittie Ake and her husband, Forrest H. Ake, decided this date. The claim for damages in the two above styled causes, and the two first above referred to as decided this date, arose out of the same automobile accident. For the purposes of trial all four cases were consolidated by the trial Judge and the issues in all four of them submitted to the jury and verdicts rendered thereon and judgments entered for the defendant in each of the four cases. The causes all came to this Court on one bill of exceptions. The questions raised and the facts as shown by the testimony in the above styled causes are on all fours with the cases of Polly Kosak and John Kosak hereinabove mentioned.

The judgment appealed from herein by the Appellants in the above styled causes are therefore affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield and Buford, J. J. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazur, Et Vir v. Ake, Et Vir Mazur v. Ake, Et Vir, 3 So. 2d 121, 147 Fla. 512, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1309 (Fla. 1941).

3 So. 2d 121 (Mazur, Et Vir v. Ake, Et Vir Mazur v. Ake, Et Vir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Press
105 A.2d 905 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)