Mazine v. Branch Banking
This text of Mazine v. Branch Banking (Mazine v. Branch Banking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 28, 2015.
________________
No. 3D14-2092 Lower Tribunal No. 13-12595 ________________
Moshe Mazine, Appellant,
vs.
Branch Banking and Trust Company, Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge.
David H. Charlip, for appellant.
Kass Shuler, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellee.
Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.
CONFESSION OF ERROR
LAGOA, J.
Appellant, Moshe Mazine (“Mazine”), appeals an order denying his Motion
to Quash Service by Publication and directing Mazine to file a response to
Appellee Branch Banking and Trust Company’s complaint. Based on Appellee’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Mazine’s
Motion to Quash Service by Publication.
While Appellee submits that adequate evidence was presented to the trial
court to establish that Mazine was avoiding service and service by publication
would be permitted pursuant to section 49.041(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2013),
Appellee concedes that the trial court’s order was incorrectly predicated on a
sworn statement made pursuant to section 49.041(3)(a), i.e., that Mazine’s
residence was “[u]nknown to the affiant.” Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s
order and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mazine v. Branch Banking, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazine-v-branch-banking-fladistctapp-2015.