Mazik v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 17, 2023·No. 2:19-cv-00559·Unknown

Opinion

1 DIMITRI D. PORTNOI (S.B. # 282871) POLLOCK COHEN LLP dportnoi@omm.com Christopher K. Leung, CA Bar No. 210325 2 KYLE M. GROSSMAN (S.B. #313952) Adam Pollock (pro hac vice) 3 kgrossman@omm.com 201 Spear Street, Suite 1100 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP San Francisco, CA 94105 4 400 S. Hope Street, 18th Floor Tel: (415) 825-8500 Los Angeles, California 90071 Email: Adam@PollockCohen.com 5 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 LAW OFFICE OF JEREMY L. FRIEDMAN 6 Jeremy L. Friedman, CA Bar No. 142659 7 Attorneys for Defendants Kaiser Foundation 2801 Sylhowe Road Health Plan, Inc.; Kaiser Foundation Oakland, CA 94610 8 Hospitals; The Permanente Medical Group, Tel: (510) 530-9060 Inc.; Southern California Permanente Medical Email: jlfried@comcast.net 9 Group; and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff-Relator, Jeffrey Mazik 10

14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. ex rel. Case No. 2:19-cv-0559-DAD-KJN 18 JEFFREY MAZIK, JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 19 Plaintiffs, RE: NON-WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE 20 AND PROTECTED MATERIAL v. 21 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, 22 INC., et al., 23 Defendants. 24

27 28 1 The Parties have jointly stipulated, seeking an Order regarding producing privileged 2 material and protected trial-preparation material. 3 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 4 The Parties recognize that, in this action, each Party (and potentially third parties) will 5 review and disclose large quantities of information and documents through the discovery process. 6 As a result, information and documents produced to another Party could include materials that 7 could have been withheld in whole or in part upon the basis of a privilege or protection, and thus 8 not subject to disclosure in discovery. The Parties desire that discovery proceed in an expeditious 9 and efficient manner without waiver of any privilege or the protection afforded to trial-preparation 10 material. Therefore, it is the intent of the Parties that the requirements set forth in Federal Rule of 11 Evidence 502(b) shall not apply to any determination of waiver under this Order. Instead, the 12 Parties set forth below the concrete directives intended to supplant the test set forth in Rule 502(b). 13 The concrete directives supplanting Rule 502(b)(1) and (2) are set forth in Paragraph 9 and the 14 concrete directives supplanting Rule 502(b)(3) are set forth in Paragraph 15. Good cause existing 15 for entry of this Protective Order, it is, pursuant to the Court’s authority under Rule 502(d) of the 16 Federal Rules of Evidence and with the consent of the Parties, ORDERED as follows: 17 DEFINITIONS 18 1. “Material” means and includes all items listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(l)(A) and (B), 19 including, but not limited to, paper documents, electronically-stored information, deposition 20 testimony, and discovery responses produced in this action. 21 2. “Protected Material” means Material that is subject to any claim of privilege that 22 may lawfully be asserted without limitation and work-product protections, including common 23 interest and protections afforded by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). 24 3. “Producing Party” means either a Party or a third-party producing Material in this 25 action. 26 4. “Receiving Party” means the Party or Parties receiving the Material from the 27 Producing Party or third-party in this action. The use of the singular “Receiving Party” includes the 28 plural “Receiving Parties.” 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 5. This Order applies to the attorney-client privilege, work-product protections, 3 including protections afforded by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b), Governmental privileges (including without 4 limitation deliberative process, investigatory files, and official privileges), trial-preparation 5 materials, and all privileges that may lawfully be asserted, without limitation. 6 6. This Order governs Material produced by a Producing Party in this action. 7 7. Subject to Paragraph 8, the production of Protected Material in this action does not 8 constitute a waiver of any privilege or protection in this action or any other federal or state 9 proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Rule 10 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 11 8. The Parties agree that disclosure need not be “inadvertent” as that term is used in 12 Rule 502(b), but agree that all productions, designations, and requests for return of Protected 13 Material will be made in good faith. Accordingly, the Producing Party shall exercise good faith to 14 prevent the disclosure of Protected Material and shall not request the return of Protected Material 15 it produced knowing it to be privileged. 16 9. The Producing Party shall not file any motion or other pleading or action to dismiss, 17 remove, or disqualify the Receiving Party, any attorney or other person employed or retained by 18 the Receiving Party, or any third-party who received, reviewed, used, or disseminated Protected 19 Material from any actions, including but not limited to this action, due to the receipt, review, use, 20 or dissemination of Protected Material produced by the Producing Party prior to the receipt of 21 written notice in accordance with Paragraph 14. 22 10. Experts for a Receiving Party may review any material produced by a Producing 23 Party, but experts shall be bound by any notice from a Producing Party under this Order to the same 24 extent as the Receiving Party who has retained the expert. 25 11. Nothing in this Order prohibits a Producing Party from withholding from production 26 any Material covered by any privilege or other protection properly claimed. 27 12. If any Party has cause to believe that a violation of this Order has occurred or is 28 about to occur, it shall have the right to petition this Court for appropriate relief. 1 13. Any Party may seek modification of this Order for good cause – including but not 2 limited to any circumstance created or exacerbated by the terms of this Order that may result in an 3 unreasonable burden being imposed on any Party – at any time, but the provisions of this Order 4 shall continue to be binding after the termination of this action, whether by settlement, judgment, 5 or other disposition or conclusion and all appeals therefrom, unless otherwise ordered. The Parties 6 agree to promptly meet and discuss joint modification of this Order should any specific provision 7 become overly burdensome upon implementation. 8 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS 9 14. If the Producing Party determines it has produced Protected Material, the Producing 10 Party shall serve written notice upon the Receiving Party’s counsel of record within ten (10) 11 business days of discovering the disclosure. This notice shall provide information sufficient to meet 12 the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5) and shall at a minimum identify for each claim of 13 privilege or protection: the Protected Material, by bates number, that it is recalling; the privilege or 14 protection asserted; and the basis for the invocation of the privilege or protection. The notice shall 15 ask that the Receiving Party take reasonable steps to either return, sequester, or destroy the 16 Protected Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazik v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Mazik v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc. (Mazik v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.