Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc.
412 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1982·No. No. 81-1332·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court has the inherent power to impose the sanction of dismissal for a plaintiff’s willful failure to comply with its order, the lawfulness of which was challenged only by plaintiff’s adamant refusal to answer certain questions on deposition. See Surrency v. Winn & Lovett Grocery Company, 160 Fla. 294, 34 So.2d 564 (1948); Warriner v. Ferraro, 177 So.2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc., 412 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
412 So. 2d 945 (Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. Allstate Insurance Co.
558 So. 2d 503 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)