Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc.

412 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19863

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 20, 1982

DocketNo. 81-1332

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 945 (Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mazer v. Jefferson Stores, Inc., 412 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court has the inherent power to impose the sanction of dismissal for a plaintiff’s willful failure to comply with its order, the lawfulness of which was challenged only by plaintiff’s adamant refusal to answer certain questions on deposition. See Surrency v. Winn & Lovett Grocery Company, 160 Fla. 294, 34 So.2d 564 (1948); Warriner v. Ferraro, 177 So.2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court has the inherent power to impose the sanction of dismissal for a plaintiff’s willful failure to comply with its order, the lawfulness of which was challenged only by plaintiff’s adamant refusal to answer certain questions on deposition. See Surrency v. Winn & Lovett Grocery Company, 160 Fla. 294, 34 So.2d 564 (1948); Warriner v. Ferraro, 177 So.2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazer-v-jefferson-stores-inc-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack