Mazel Associates, Inc. v. Bogdan
This text of 17 Misc. 2d 200 (Mazel Associates, Inc. v. Bogdan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The service of a bill of particulars in compliance with a conditional order of preclusion was improperly rejected by the plaintiff and it was error for the lower court [201]*201to deny defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to accept the bill. This determination, however, is without prejudice to plaintiff’s application for a further bill or final order of preclusion, if it is so advised, upon a statement showing in what respect it deems the bill insufficient.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Misc. 2d 200, 183 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazel-associates-inc-v-bogdan-nyappterm-1959.