Mayzck v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mayzck v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

284 A.D.2d 312, 725 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 312 (Mayzck v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayzck v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 284 A.D.2d 312, 725 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated September 22, 1999, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The affidavit of the plaintiffs attorney in opposition to the appellant’s prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment through the affidavit of its expert was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated September 22, 1999, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The affidavit of the plaintiffs attorney in opposition to the appellant’s prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment through the affidavit of its expert was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 312, 725 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayzck-v-brooklyn-union-gas-co-nyappdiv-2001.