Maysville Water Company v. Stockton

299 S.W. 582, 221 Ky. 610, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 807
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedMay 17, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 299 S.W. 582 (Maysville Water Company v. Stockton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maysville Water Company v. Stockton, 299 S.W. 582, 221 Ky. 610, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 807 (Ky. 1927).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Hobson

Affirming.

In 1879 the city of Maysville enacted an ordinance under which, the Maysville Water Company supplied water to the inhabitants of the city at annual rates or at meter rates, as provided in the ordinance. Some years after this E. T. Kirk proposed to put .up an .apartment house, the first ever constructed in the city. This building is four stories high and contains eight apartments, two on each floor. The apartments are entirely separate from each other; there is a common hallway in the front of the building, into which each apartment opens. There is a single water service for the building, which is heated by a heating plant in the basement; also a laundry in the basement for' the common use of all the tenants. The owner of the building has the basement and halls kept clean. The hot water is used by all the tenants; each has a separate kitchen and bathroom, with the usual appurtenances.

When Kirk proposed to build the building, he went to see the president of the water company, and it was agreed between them that a single meter should be installed in the building, and that all water supplied'should be charged at meter rates and paid, by Kirk as a single consumer. He built the building, and for 11 years the water was supplied and paid for at meter rates under this arrangement. But in the year 1924, the president of the company having died, and a new president coming in, the water company declined to furnish water any *612 longer to the building at meter rates, and insisted that each apartment was a dwelling house, within the meaning of the ordinance, and must pa,y dwelling house rates, as provided in the ordinance. This litigation followed. The circuit court decided against the water company, and it appeals.

• It is stipulated in the record that so much of the ordinance as is material to the cáse is in these words:

“Be it further ordained, that the said company shall have, the power and authority to make and enforce, as a part of the condition upon which it will supply water to consumers, all needful rules and regulations not inconsistent with the law or conditions of this ordinance, and may charge for the supply of water to the inhabitants of the said city, annual rates not exceeding the following tariff, and may collect the said rates in advance:
Annual Schedule of Water Rates.
Ale cellars .........................................-...............................$10.00 to $20.00
Barber shops, one chair .........................-..........■-........................... 5.00
Barber shops, each additional chair ........................................ 3.00
Bathing tubs, public, each............................................................ 10.00
Bathing tubs, private, hot and cold each................................' 6.00
Bathing tubs, private, cold............................................................ ■ 2.50
Banks, including one basin ....................................................... 10.00
Bakeries ..............................................................................10.00 to 30.00
■Butcher shops ....................................................................10.00 to 20.00
Brickyards..........................................................................................Special
Breweries or distilleries ................................................................Special
Book binderies ........,.......................................................................Special
. Building purposes, per 1,000 bricks .......................................... .10
Building purposes, perch of stone ..................,......................... .10
Building purposes, plastering, per 100 sq. yds........................20
Blacksmith shops, one forge .........................-..............-............. 5.00
Blacksmith shops, each additional fire ..................................... 4.00
Boarding houses, in addition to dwelling house, rates for each room additional ............................1................................... 2.00
Churches ............................................................................................ 10.00
Confectioneries ..................................................................10.00 to , 50.00
Dwelling houses, four rooms or less ...................................... 5.00
For each additional room ........... 1.00
Dyeing and scouring..........................................................10.0Ó to 30.00
Elevators ........'...............................................*....................................Spécial
Filling private cisterns, each time ............................................ 3.00
Fountains, six hours per day, in season of six months ........Special
Gasworks, meter or ........................................................................Special
Halls and theaters ..........................................................................Special
Hose for sprinkling lots, per season, one-half inch pipe, fifty feet square or less ............................................................ 4.00
Hose, for sprinkling lots, per season, one-half inch pipe, 75 feet square, or less .............................................. 5.00
One-half inch pipe, one hundred feet square-or less .......... 6.00
*613 'Annual Schedule- of , Water Rates.
Hose for sprinkling street and sidewalks, washing windows, per front foot............................................................-....... $0.25
Corner lots, double rates-. Hose, when used as fountain, fountain rates. , . Hotels ......................................:..................................................'...Special
Lumber yards.....................................................-*-...........................Special
Laundries ............................................................-......................-......Special
Manufactories ..................................................................................Special

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashcraft v. Currier
694 S.W.2d 707 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1985)
Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. City of Covington
139 S.W.2d 64 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1940)
McNally, Etc. v. Grauman, Etc., Jefferson Cty.
73 S.W.2d 28 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 S.W. 582, 221 Ky. 610, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maysville-water-company-v-stockton-kyctapphigh-1927.