Maysville Transit Co. v. Taylor
This text of 177 S.W.2d 371 (Maysville Transit Co. v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
This case, like the case of Maysville Transit Company v. Ort et al., 296 Ky. 524, 177 S. W. (2d) 369, is one of the eight suits referred to in Tomlin v. Taylor, 290 Ky. 619, 162 S. W. (2d) 210. In those cases it was held that KRS 131.190 is applicable only to tax officials and employees handling tax schedules, returns or reports, and other officials, who are authorized under the statute to receive the confidential tax information with which the statute deals. Since Taylor and Purdon did not come within the purview of the statute, the petition did not state a cause of action against them for their reprehensible acts in publicizing the Company’s tax reports made confidential by the statute in question.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 S.W.2d 371, 296 Ky. 527, 1943 Ky. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maysville-transit-co-v-taylor-kyctapphigh-1943.