Mayshark Builders, Inc. v. Chautauqua Institution

254 A.D.2d 707, 678 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10375

This text of 254 A.D.2d 707 (Mayshark Builders, Inc. v. Chautauqua Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayshark Builders, Inc. v. Chautauqua Institution, 254 A.D.2d 707, 678 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We note that a judgment was entered on the same date as the order from which the appeal was taken. The order is subsumed within the judgment and the appeal is from the judgment, not the order (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988). We exercise our discretion to disregard the misstatement in the notice of appeal, and we treat the appeal as taken from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Cass, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 707, 678 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayshark-builders-inc-v-chautauqua-institution-nyappdiv-1998.