Mayse v. State
1919 OK CR 164, 179 P. 624, 16 Okla. Crim. 670, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 125
This text of 1919 OK CR 164 (Mayse v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mayse v. State, 1919 OK CR 164, 179 P. 624, 16 Okla. Crim. 670, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 125 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
No brief has been filed in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and the cause was submitted on a motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute.
We have examined the record, and find that there is evidence sufficient to support the judgment, and there being no apparent error warranting a reversal, the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 164, 179 P. 624, 16 Okla. Crim. 670, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayse-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.