Mays v. Wilson

81 S.E. 440, 141 Ga. 523, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. A ground of a motion for a new trial because of newly discovered evidence is without merit where no affidavits of the alleged newly discovered witnesses are attached to the motion, though referred to in the ground thereof, and where there is no affidavit as to the character, credibility, etc., of such witnesses, and the affidavit of the movant and his counsel as to diligence merely states the conclusion that they could not have discovered the alleged new evidence by the use of ordinary diligence.

2. Where, on the trial of a claim case, the judge in his instructions to the jury covered the issues, it is not cause for a new trial that he did not more fully adapt his language to the facts of the case, in the absence of a special request in writing so to do.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays v. Wilson, 81 S.E. 440, 141 Ga. 523, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 28 (Ga. 1914).

81 S.E. 440 (Mays v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fowler v. State
45 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Southern Railway Co. v. Ray
113 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)