Mays v. United States Express Co.
146 Ill. App. 387, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 367
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The question presented in this case was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error in Cutter v. Wells Fargo & Co., 237 Ill., 247. On the authority of that case the judgment in this case will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mays v. United States Express Co., 146 Ill. App. 387, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 367 (Ill. Ct. App. 1909).
146 Ill. App. 387 (Mays v. United States Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henkleman v. Peterson
50 Ill. App. 601 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)