Mays v. State
This text of 190 S.E. 46 (Mays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offenses of possessing and selling whisky. Hie evidence, while circumstantial, authorized his conviction of both offenses, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis; and none of the special assignments of error in the petition [434]*434for certiorari shows reversible error. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.E. 46, 55 Ga. App. 433, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-state-gactapp-1937.