Mays v. State

130 S.E. 832, 34 Ga. App. 696, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 503
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 16, 1925
Docket16824
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 832 (Mays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mays v. State, 130 S.E. 832, 34 Ga. App. 696, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

While the evidence in this case was circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 832, 34 Ga. App. 696, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-state-gactapp-1925.