Mays v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mays v. State

565 So. 2d 896, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6442, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2137

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 22, 1990

DocketNo. 88-00807

StatusPublished

This text of 565 So. 2d 896 (Mays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. State, 565 So. 2d 896, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6442, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we find that although the sentencing judge specifically stated that costs were not imposed, the judgment reflects the imposition of court costs.

Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court for correction of the judgment to delete the imposition of court costs. The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we find that although the sentencing judge specifically stated that costs were not imposed, the judgment reflects the imposition of court costs.

Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court for correction of the judgment to delete the imposition of court costs. The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 So. 2d 896, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6442, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.