Mays v. State

450 So. 2d 299, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1984·No. No. 83-831·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Mays’ conviction for the crime of third degree murder. We reverse, however, Mays’ conviction for the crime of grand theft because that crime was a predicate supporting the murder conviction. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983); Boivin v. State, 436 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review granted, No. 64,368 (Fla. Mar. 30, 1984). We reverse the reservation of jurisdiction over the sentence on the authority of Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla.1983), and Owen v. State, 441 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays v. State, 450 So. 2d 299, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

450 So. 2d 299 (Mays v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Akins v. State
462 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)