Mays v. State
This text of 450 So. 2d 299 (Mays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON REHEARING
We affirm Mays’ conviction for the crime of third degree murder. We reverse, however, Mays’ conviction for the crime of grand theft because that crime was a predicate supporting the murder conviction. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983); Boivin v. State, 436 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review granted, No. 64,368 (Fla. Mar. 30, 1984). We reverse the reservation of jurisdiction over the sentence on the authority of Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla.1983), and Owen v. State, 441 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 So. 2d 299, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.