Mays v. State

959 So. 2d 216, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1044, 2007 WL 1628269
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 7, 2007·No. No. SC04-2149·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

LEWIS, C.J.

This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Mays v. State, 887 So.2d 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The district court certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Baez v. State, 814 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), quashed, 894 So.2d 115 (Fla.2004). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The issue presented by the decision under review is controlled by our recent decision in Golphin v. State, 945 So.2d 1174 (Fla.2006), petition for cert. filed, 75 U.S.L.W. 3512 (U.S. Mar. 9, 2007) (No. 06-1251). Therefore, we exercise our jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, and, in accordance with Golphin, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J. specially concurs with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays v. State, 959 So. 2d 216, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1044, 2007 WL 1628269 (Fla. 2007).

959 So. 2d 216 (Mays v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.T. v. State
87 So. 3d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
State v. Dixon
976 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)