Mays v. State

959 So. 2d 216, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1044, 2007 WL 1628269
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2007
DocketNo. SC04-2149
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 959 So. 2d 216 (Mays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mays v. State, 959 So. 2d 216, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1044, 2007 WL 1628269 (Fla. 2007).

Opinions

LEWIS, C.J.

This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Mays v. State, 887 So.2d 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The district court certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Baez v. State, 814 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), quashed, 894 So.2d 115 (Fla.2004). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The issue presented by the decision under review is controlled by our recent decision in Golphin v. State, 945 So.2d 1174 (Fla.2006), petition for cert. filed, 75 U.S.L.W. 3512 (U.S. Mar. 9, 2007) (No. 06-1251). Therefore, we exercise our jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, and, in accordance with Golphin, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J. specially concurs with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.T. v. State
87 So. 3d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
State v. Dixon
976 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
959 So. 2d 216, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1044, 2007 WL 1628269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-state-fla-2007.