Mays v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co.
This text of 160 So. 2d 245 (Mays v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues involved in this case have been set forth and considered in the opinion of this court in the case of Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company, 160 So.2d 242.
For the reasons therein set forth, the judgment appealed from is reversed and set aside, and
[246]*246It is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the reconventional demand of the defendant, H. G. Odom, as against the plaintiffs, William N. Mays and Maryland Casualty Company, be and they are hereby rejected at appellant’s cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 So. 2d 245, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-southern-farm-bureau-casualty-co-lactapp-1964.