Mays v. Schell

Michigan Supreme Court

Mays v. Schell

711 N.W.2d 381, 474 Mich. 1109

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 7, 2006

Docket129895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 N.W.2d 381 (Mays v. Schell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. Schell, 711 N.W.2d 381, 474 Mich. 1109 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 381 (2006) 474 Mich. 1109

Patricia MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gerald SCHELL, M.D., and Valley Neurosurgery, P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and
St. Mary's Medical Center of Saginaw, Defendant.

Docket No. 129895, COA No. 253816.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 7, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the order of the Saginaw Circuit Court granting a new trial. The trial court's decision did not amount to an abuse of discretion in that it fell within a "principled range of outcomes." City of Novi v. Robert Adell Children's Funded Trust, 473 Mich. 242, 254, 701 N.W.2d 144 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

711 N.W.2d 381 (2006) 474 Mich. 1109

Patricia MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gerald SCHELL, M.D., and Valley Neurosurgery, P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and
St. Mary's Medical Center of Saginaw, Defendant.

Docket No. 129895, COA No. 253816.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 7, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the order of the Saginaw Circuit Court granting a new trial. The trial court's decision did not amount to an abuse of discretion in that it fell within a "principled range of outcomes." City of Novi v. Robert Adell Children's Funded Trust, 473 Mich. 242, 254, 701 N.W.2d 144 (2005).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 N.W.2d 381, 474 Mich. 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-schell-mich-2006.

Opinion

Patricia MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald SCHELL, M.D., and Valley Neurosurgery, P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and St. Mary's Medical Center of Saginaw, Defendant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Patricia MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gerald SCHELL, M.D., and Valley Neurosurgery, P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and
St. Mary's Medical Center of Saginaw, Defendant.