Mays v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mays v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

107 So. 3d 559, 2013 WL 692970, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 2013

DocketNo. 1D12-1306

StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 3d 559 (Mays v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, 107 So. 3d 559, 2013 WL 692970, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deborah G. Mays appeals an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission affirming a referee’s decision holding her disqualified from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. The Commission has moved to relinquish jurisdiction, commendably acknowledging that although the referee relied upon certain hearsay evidence in making her findings of fact, her order does not reflect that she undertook the analysis required in order for hearsay evidence alone to support a finding of fact in an unemployment compensation case. See § 443.151(4)(b)5.c., Fla. Stat. (2012). We elect to treat the motion as a concession of error, reverse the order on appeal in accordance there[560]*560with, and remand to the Commission for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Deborah G. Mays appeals an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission affirming a referee’s decision holding her disqualified from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. The Commission has moved to relinquish jurisdiction, commendably acknowledging that although the referee relied upon certain hearsay evidence in making her findings of fact, her order does not reflect that she undertook the analysis required in order for hearsay evidence alone to support a finding of fact in an unemployment compensation case. See § 443.151(4)(b)5.c., Fla. Stat. (2012). We elect to treat the motion as a concession of error, reverse the order on appeal in accordance there[560]*560with, and remand to the Commission for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 3d 559, 2013 WL 692970, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-reemployment-assistance-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2013.