Mays v. Mays

388 N.W.2d 118, 223 Neb. 123, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mays v. Mays. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 Neb. 674
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 1986·No. No. 85-179·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record de novo, which we are required to do, we find the action of the trial court in its division of both nonmarital and marital assets and the awarding of alimony to be fair and reasonable under the circumstances and not the result of an abuse of discretion. Applegate v. Applegate, 219 Neb. 532, 365 N.W.2d 394 (1985); Rockwood v. Rockwood, 219 Neb. 21, 360 N.W.2d 497 (1985); Guggenmos v. Guggenmos, 218 Neb. 746, 359 N.W.2d 87 (1984); Reuter v. Reuter, 218 Neb. 732, 359 N.W.2d 78 (1984); Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk, 212 Neb. 730, 325 N.W.2d 832 (1982).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays v. Mays, 388 N.W.2d 118, 223 Neb. 123, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1182 (Neb. 1986).

388 N.W.2d 118 (Mays v. Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk
325 N.W.2d 832 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
Applegate v. Applegate
365 N.W.2d 394 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Reuter v. Reuter
359 N.W.2d 78 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
Guggenmos v. Guggenmos
359 N.W.2d 87 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
Rockwood v. Rockwood
360 N.W.2d 497 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)