Mays v. Internal Revenue Service
This text of 81 F. App'x 900 (Mays v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dale G. Mays and Sylvia M. Wilhelmi, husband and wife, filed the instant action, alleging the Internal Revenue Service unjustly withheld their tax refund for the 1994 tax year. The District Court 1 dismissed the action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). We conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion: appellants produced requested discovery only after the District Court’s repeated interventions, they failed to comply with court orders or to appear at scheduled conferences and hearings, and they were specifically warned that failure to comply with a particular court order would result in dismissal of their action with prejudice. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b); Good Stewardship Christian Center v. Empire Bank, 341 F.3d 794, 797 (8th Cir.2003) (standard of review); Rodgers v. Curators of Univ. of Mo., 135 F.3d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir.1998); Aziz v. Wright, 34 F.3d 587, 589 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1090, 115 S.Ct. 752, 130 L.Ed.2d 652 (1995).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-internal-revenue-service-ca8-2003.