Mays v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mays v. Fischer

105 A.D.3d 1283, 963 N.Y.S.2d 604

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2013·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, stalking and interference with an employee after he was observed leaning out of a line waiting to go through a metal detector in order to stare at a female correction officer. After petitioner was overheard making an inappropriate remark, the ensuing disturbance delayed the security processing of inmates in the line. Petitioner was found guilty of all but the stalking charge at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing. That determination was affirmed upon petitioner’s administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

[1284]*1284We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Amaker v Bezio, 98 AD3d 1146, 1146 [2012]; Matter of Shields v Fischer, 95 AD3d 1574, 1574 [2012]). While petitioner denied committing the conduct alleged in the report, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Spikes v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1231, 1231 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 862 [2013]).

Peters, EJ., Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, stalking and interference with an employee after he was observed leaning out of a line waiting to go through a metal detector in order to stare at a female correction officer. After petitioner was overheard making an inappropriate remark, the ensuing disturbance delayed the security processing of inmates in the line. Petitioner was found guilty of all but the stalking charge at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing. That determination was affirmed upon petitioner’s administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

[1284]*1284We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Amaker v Bezio, 98 AD3d 1146, 1146 [2012]; Matter of Shields v Fischer, 95 AD3d 1574, 1574 [2012]). While petitioner denied committing the conduct alleged in the report, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Spikes v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1231, 1231 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 862 [2013]).

Peters, EJ., Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Mays v. Fischer, 105 A.D.3d 1283, 963 N.Y.S.2d 604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

105 A.D.3d 1283 (Mays v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related