Mays v. Engle

Ohio Supreme Court

Mays v. Engle

431 N.E.2d 1006, 69 Ohio St. 2d 166, 23 Ohio Op. 3d 197, 1982 Ohio LEXIS 554

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1982

DocketNo. 81-1036

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 431 N.E.2d 1006 (Mays v. Engle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. Engle, 431 N.E.2d 1006, 69 Ohio St. 2d 166, 23 Ohio Op. 3d 197, 1982 Ohio LEXIS 554 (Ohio 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision and journal entry of the Court of Appeals states, in part, “ * * * finding that the complaint on its face does not state a cause of action entitling petitioner to relief, respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted.”

For the reason that appellant did not challenge the jurisdiction of the sentencing court, Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the habeas corpus petition, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI