Mays v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia

85 A.3d 466, 624 Pa. 285, 2014 WL 444227, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 350
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 5, 2014
DocketNo. 190 EM 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.3d 466 (Mays v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mays v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, 85 A.3d 466, 624 Pa. 285, 2014 WL 444227, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 350 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, treated as an Application for Relief, are GRANTED. Appointed counsel has failed to represent Petitioner in the absence of a court order granting him leave to withdraw as counsel, thereby compromising Petitioner’s appellate rights. [467]*467The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is directed to appoint new counsel to Petitioner within 14 days of this order. The trial court shall provide notice of the appointment order to this Court within 5 days of issuing that order.

The Prothonotary is directed to provide notice of this Court’s order to the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office and Anthony J. Voci, Esquire. The Prothonotary is also directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A.3d 466, 624 Pa. 285, 2014 WL 444227, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-court-of-common-pleas-of-philadelphia-pa-2014.