Mays v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Mays v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare

448 A.2d 1194, 67 Pa. Commw. 528, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1387

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 20, 1982

DocketAppeal, No. 355 C.D. 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 448 A.2d 1194 (Mays v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare, 448 A.2d 1194, 67 Pa. Commw. 528, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1387 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Petitioner Alice Mays questions a final adjudication of the Department of Public Welfare affirming a decision of the Delaware County Board of Assistance which discontinued public assistance to the petitioner as payee for her grandson, Donald.

The hearing examiner found that the petitioner has cared for Donald — now eighteen years old — since he was an infant, and that Donald’s mother, Joann Ruggiero, who has two other children, has never contributed to his support. Because the petitioner and Donald have lived with Ms. Ruggiero since 1975, and because Donald’s mother has been receiving maternity benefits from her employer in lieu of salary since June of 1980, the examiner affirmed the board’s conclusion that Donald was ineligible for assistance, under Sections 183.22 and 183.44(b) of the Public Assistance Eligibility Manual, 55 Pa. Code §§183.22 and 183.44; those sections¹ create a presumption that the [530]*530income of a legally responsible relative, such as the mother of a minor child living in the same household, is available for the support of her dependents.

Citing the Pennsylvania Support Law² and the general policy provisions for public assistance,³ the petitioner contends that the department must “develop” the potential resources of Donald’s natural [531]*531mother through a court petition to compel her to support him.

Because Section 1973 of the Support Law authorizes not only the department, but also the indigent person or “any other person or public body or public agency having any interest in the care, maintenance or assistance of such indigent person” to petition a common pleas court to compel financial assistance, we cannot interpret the language of 55 Pa. Code §187.21, mandating exploration and development of resources which a legally responsible relative may provide to an assistance recipient, as requiring the department, and only the department, to bring proceedings to compel support.

Accordingly, we affirm.

Order

Now, July 20, 1982, the final adjudication of the Department of Public Welfare, dated January 19, 1981, case No. 92003-C, is affirmed.

¹

Section 183.22 (ii) defines income as:

Any money which is available to [a client] except as provided in §183.44 (relating to procedures) and §183.64 (relating to procedures) from certain persons living with him, such as a parent-

[530]*530Section 183.44(b) provides:

The income considered available to the dependent or dependents applying for or receiving assistance will be arrived at by deducting aUowances for his living expenses from the income of the spouse or parent.

(3) Remainder. The remainder, up to the amount of the total allowances for the dependent or dependents applying for or receiving assistance, will be considered income available to these dependents.

Using these regulations, the county assistance office calculated that the income available for Donald’s support was $905.90:

Joann Ruggiero’s monthly income from maternity benefits of $231.60 per week $995.90

Less difference between two-person and one-person assistance grant —90.00

Income available for Donald’s support $905.90

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Petitioner Alice Mays questions a final adjudication of the Department of Public Welfare affirming a decision of the Delaware County Board of Assistance which discontinued public assistance to the petitioner as payee for her grandson, Donald.

The hearing examiner found that the petitioner has cared for Donald — now eighteen years old — since he was an infant, and that Donald’s mother, Joann Ruggiero, who has two other children, has never contributed to his support. Because the petitioner and Donald have lived with Ms. Ruggiero since 1975, and because Donald’s mother has been receiving maternity benefits from her employer in lieu of salary since June of 1980, the examiner affirmed the board’s conclusion that Donald was ineligible for assistance, under Sections 183.22 and 183.44(b) of the Public Assistance Eligibility Manual, 55 Pa. Code §§183.22 and 183.44; those sections¹ create a presumption that the [530]*530income of a legally responsible relative, such as the mother of a minor child living in the same household, is available for the support of her dependents.

Citing the Pennsylvania Support Law² and the general policy provisions for public assistance,³ the petitioner contends that the department must “develop” the potential resources of Donald’s natural [531]*531mother through a court petition to compel her to support him.

Because Section 1973 of the Support Law authorizes not only the department, but also the indigent person or “any other person or public body or public agency having any interest in the care, maintenance or assistance of such indigent person” to petition a common pleas court to compel financial assistance, we cannot interpret the language of 55 Pa. Code §187.21, mandating exploration and development of resources which a legally responsible relative may provide to an assistance recipient, as requiring the department, and only the department, to bring proceedings to compel support.

Accordingly, we affirm.

Order

Now, July 20, 1982, the final adjudication of the Department of Public Welfare, dated January 19, 1981, case No. 92003-C, is affirmed.

¹

Section 183.22 (ii) defines income as:

Any money which is available to [a client] except as provided in §183.44 (relating to procedures) and §183.64 (relating to procedures) from certain persons living with him, such as a parent-

[530]*530Section 183.44(b) provides:

The income considered available to the dependent or dependents applying for or receiving assistance will be arrived at by deducting aUowances for his living expenses from the income of the spouse or parent.

(3) Remainder. The remainder, up to the amount of the total allowances for the dependent or dependents applying for or receiving assistance, will be considered income available to these dependents.

Using these regulations, the county assistance office calculated that the income available for Donald’s support was $905.90:

Joann Ruggiero’s monthly income from maternity benefits of $231.60 per week $995.90

Less difference between two-person and one-person assistance grant —90.00

Income available for Donald’s support $905.90

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 A.2d 1194, 67 Pa. Commw. 528, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-commonwealth-department-of-public-welfare-pacommwct-1982.