Home/Supreme Court/Mays v. California

Mays v. California

374 U.S. 490, 83 S. Ct. 1883
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1963·No. 871, Misc·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

374 U.S. 490 (1963)

MAYS
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 871, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays v. California, 374 U.S. 490, 83 S. Ct. 1883 (1963).

374 U.S. 490 (Mays v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mays
228 Cal. App. 2d 842 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)