Mays v. Burrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mays v. Burrell

124 A.D.2d 714, 508 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 714 (Mays v. Burrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. Burrell, 124 A.D.2d 714, 508 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding after a March 31, 1985 special meeting of the Antioch Baptist Church resulted in a vote to disband the church’s senior choir. The court dismissed the proceeding, noting that "[t]he dispute over the disbanding of the choir is a controversy involving questions of church discipline and ecclesiastical rule and should be determined by the church judicatory and not the civil courts of the State.”

The determination dismissing the proceeding was proper. It is well established that absent the invasion of civil or property rights, courts will not interfere with matters such as the instant one, concerning the internal affairs of a church (see, Rector of Church of Holy Trinity v Melish, 4 AD2d 256, affd 3 NY2d 476; Rector of Christ’s Church v Collett, 208 App Div 695, affd 240 NY 563; Waller v Howell, 20 Misc 236). Moreover, the petitioner’s conclusory allegations concerning the respondent’s alleged violations of Religious Corporations Law § 164, dealing with the qualification of voters at the special meeting and of the notice provisions of the Religious Corpora[715]*715tions Law, are insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding after a March 31, 1985 special meeting of the Antioch Baptist Church resulted in a vote to disband the church’s senior choir. The court dismissed the proceeding, noting that "[t]he dispute over the disbanding of the choir is a controversy involving questions of church discipline and ecclesiastical rule and should be determined by the church judicatory and not the civil courts of the State.”

The determination dismissing the proceeding was proper. It is well established that absent the invasion of civil or property rights, courts will not interfere with matters such as the instant one, concerning the internal affairs of a church (see, Rector of Church of Holy Trinity v Melish, 4 AD2d 256, affd 3 NY2d 476; Rector of Christ’s Church v Collett, 208 App Div 695, affd 240 NY 563; Waller v Howell, 20 Misc 236). Moreover, the petitioner’s conclusory allegations concerning the respondent’s alleged violations of Religious Corporations Law § 164, dealing with the qualification of voters at the special meeting and of the notice provisions of the Religious Corpora[715]*715tions Law, are insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D.2d 714, 508 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-burrell-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack