Mays, Randall Wayne

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 16, 2011·No. WR-75,105-01·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-75,105-01
EX PARTE RANDALL WAYNE MAYS, APPLICANT


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NUMBER B-15,717 392nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY

Keasler, J., filed a concurring statement in which Price, J., joined.

CONCURRING STATEMENT
I write separately to note my disagreement with some of the trial judge's findings and conclusions.

The trial judge finds and concludes that trial counsels failure to request a competency hearing and to raise the issue of insanity was a reasonable strategic determination. I am not totally convinced that counsels stated reasons can be characterized as reasonable trial strategy under the facts here. (1) However, Applicant has not made the requisite showing of prejudice. (2) I would therefore deny relief on grounds two and three on that basis.



DATE FILED: March 16, 2011

DO NOT PUBLISH



1. See e.g., Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 521-22 (2003).

2. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays, Randall Wayne, (Tex. 2011).

Mays, Randall Wayne (Mays, Randall Wayne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
539 U.S. 510 (Supreme Court, 2003)