May's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

May's Estate

102 A. 422, 259 Pa. 115, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 527

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 30, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 230

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 A. 422 (May's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May's Estate, 102 A. 422, 259 Pa. 115, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 527 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The provision in the will of the testatrix for Mary E. McManemy, now Mary E. Mulliken, was for income only, and, with the codicil’s revocation of that provision* there was, as the court below correctly held, an intestacy as to such income, without affecting the testamentary disposition of the corpus or principal from which it accrued : Reiehard’s App., 116 Pa. 232.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The provision in the will of the testatrix for Mary E. McManemy, now Mary E. Mulliken, was for income only, and, with the codicil’s revocation of that provision* there was, as the court below correctly held, an intestacy as to such income, without affecting the testamentary disposition of the corpus or principal from which it accrued : Reiehard’s App., 116 Pa. 232.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A. 422, 259 Pa. 115, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-estate-pa-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack