Mayrant v. Williams

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Mayrant v. Williams

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided February 16, 1764·Published

Opinion

Mr. Pinckney Sollicitor for the Complainant moved (for the Reasons in Bill set forth) that a Writt of Injunction might Issue, the Complainant having complied with the Directions of the Act of Assembly by making a Deposit with the Master. Mr. Leigh Sollicitor for the Defendant objected against the Injunction’s issuing alledging that the Defendant being a free Mulattoe, his Answer could not be taken upon Oath The Court did Order that the Injunction do issue and that the Defendant do Answer by Tuesday next.

John Troup, Register in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Pinckney Sollicitor for the Complainant moved (for the Reasons in Bill set forth) that a Writt of Injunction might Issue, the Complainant having complied with the Directions of the Act of Assembly by making a Deposit with the Master. Mr. Leigh Sollicitor for the Defendant objected against the Injunction’s issuing alledging that the Defendant being a free Mulattoe, his Answer could not be taken upon Oath The Court did Order that the Injunction do issue and that the Defendant do Answer by Tuesday next.

John Troup, Register in Chancery

Mayrant v. Williams, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1764).

Pincite

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525 (Mayrant v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.