Mayrant v. Williams

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Mayrant v. Williams

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 16, 1764

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525 (Mayrant v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayrant v. Williams, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1764).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Pinckney Sollicitor for the Complainant moved (for the Reasons in Bill set forth) that a Writt of Injunction might Issue, the Complainant having complied with the Directions of the Act of Assembly by making a Deposit with the Master. Mr. Leigh Sollicitor for the Defendant objected against the Injunction’s issuing alledging that the Defendant being a free Mulattoe, his Answer could not be taken upon Oath The Court did Order that the Injunction do issue and that the Defendant do Answer by Tuesday next.

John Troup, Register in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Pinckney Sollicitor for the Complainant moved (for the Reasons in Bill set forth) that a Writt of Injunction might Issue, the Complainant having complied with the Directions of the Act of Assembly by making a Deposit with the Master. Mr. Leigh Sollicitor for the Defendant objected against the Injunction’s issuing alledging that the Defendant being a free Mulattoe, his Answer could not be taken upon Oath The Court did Order that the Injunction do issue and that the Defendant do Answer by Tuesday next.

John Troup, Register in Chancery

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayrant-v-williams-ctchansc-1764.