Mayor v. Mason

4 U.S. 266, 4 Dall. 266
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 1, 1803
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 4 U.S. 266 (Mayor v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayor v. Mason, 4 U.S. 266, 4 Dall. 266 (1803).

Opinion

4 U.S. 266 (____)
4 Dall. 266

The Mayor, &c.
versus
Mason.

Supreme Court of United States.

*267 The exceptions were supported by M'Kean and Porter.

But, by the COURT:

Some of the objections are insurmountable. In the first place, it is not sufficient to state the evidence; but the magistrate must go on to declare, that the offence was committed, and the defendant thereof convicted. Here, neither the offence, nor the conviction, are to be found in the proceedings. In the next place, we have no statement where the defendant carried on the business of huckster; and it might be where it was no offence to do so; or where the corporation had no jurisdiction to punish it as an offence. The proceedings are, therefore, manifestly erroneous, and must be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Phillips
1 Park. Cr. 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
People v. Phillips
1 Edm. Sel. Cas. 386 (New York Circuit Court, 1847)
Owen v. Simpson
3 Watts 87 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1834)
Peddle v. Hollinshead
9 Serg. & Rawle 277 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1823)
Burrows v. Heysham
1 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 1785)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 266, 4 Dall. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-v-mason-scotus-1803.