Mayor v. Felder

95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 731, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 500
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 1918
Docket8372
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 14 (Mayor v. Felder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayor v. Felder, 95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 731, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 500 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The Supreme Court in this case (145 Ga. 440, 89 S. E. 423),. settled the question as to whether the petition set forth a legal cause of action.

2. Prom the evidence the jury were authorized to find that the plaintiff had proved his case as laid; and while the excerpt from the charge of the court complained of may be subject to the criticism that it was too general, yet when the entire charge is considered there is no such error assigned as to require a reversal. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jehhvns, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayor of Unadilla v. Felder
89 S.E. 423 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 731, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-v-felder-gactapp-1918.