Mayor of the City of Roodhouse v. Briggs

Appellate Court of Illinois

Mayor of the City of Roodhouse v. Briggs

105 Ill. App. 116, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 38

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedNovember 1, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 Ill. App. 116 (Mayor of the City of Roodhouse v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayor of the City of Roodhouse v. Briggs, 105 Ill. App. 116, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 38 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Burroughs

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a petition for a writ of mandamus, brought by Mattie E. Briggs against the mayor and city council of the city of Roodhouse, in the Circuit Court of Greene County, to compel them to pass an ordinance disconnecting certain territory belonging to her from the city. The Circuit Court awarded the writ and on appeal by the city to the Supreme Court the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction in that court to entertain same before the case had been reviewed by this court and the mayor and city council now prosecute a writ of error out of this court to the Circuit Court to obtain a reversal of the judgment of the latter court.

After the judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court the general assembly passed the act of May 10, 1901, making it discretionary with the city council whether it would not disconnect territory on the application of the owners thereof.

In Vance v. Rankin, 194 Ill. 625, it is held that said act of May 10th was applicable to judgments already rendered when the ordinance making the disconnection had not been passed and the cases in which such judgments had been rendered were pending in upper courts for review at the time said act was passed. (City of Charleston v. Wiley, 195 Ill. 433.)

What was said by the Supreme Court in the cases supra, is conclusive of the question in this case. The judgment of the Circuit Court will therefore be reversed.

Each party will pay his own costs in this court. (City of Charleston v. Wiley, supra.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Burroughs

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a petition for a writ of mandamus, brought by Mattie E. Briggs against the mayor and city council of the city of Roodhouse, in the Circuit Court of Greene County, to compel them to pass an ordinance disconnecting certain territory belonging to her from the city. The Circuit Court awarded the writ and on appeal by the city to the Supreme Court the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction in that court to entertain same before the case had been reviewed by this court and the mayor and city council now prosecute a writ of error out of this court to the Circuit Court to obtain a reversal of the judgment of the latter court.

After the judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court the general assembly passed the act of May 10, 1901, making it discretionary with the city council whether it would not disconnect territory on the application of the owners thereof.

In Vance v. Rankin, 194 Ill. 625, it is held that said act of May 10th was applicable to judgments already rendered when the ordinance making the disconnection had not been passed and the cases in which such judgments had been rendered were pending in upper courts for review at the time said act was passed. (City of Charleston v. Wiley, 195 Ill. 433.)

What was said by the Supreme Court in the cases supra, is conclusive of the question in this case. The judgment of the Circuit Court will therefore be reversed.

Each party will pay his own costs in this court. (City of Charleston v. Wiley, supra.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 Ill. App. 116, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-the-city-of-roodhouse-v-briggs-illappct-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack