Mayor of Savannah v. Hartridge

37 Ga. 113
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 Ga. 113 (Mayor of Savannah v. Hartridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayor of Savannah v. Hartridge, 37 Ga. 113 (Ga. 1867).

Opinion

Harris, J.

• Was Judge Elemming right in refusing to allow the counsel of plaintiffs in error, to prove by the witness, under examination “ Whether Hartridge would not derive benefit from the proposed extension of the street through his land ?” is the only question presented for our consideration.

Adhering to the decision made in the case of Jones vs. Wills Valley Railroad, 30th Ga. R., page 43 — the question admits of but an affirmative answer

In that case it was decided that where the private property of a citizen was taken against his wish and will, for a railroad, he should be paid the value of the property so taken in coin. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stansell & Rape Bros. v. City of McDonough
177 S.E. 749 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
City of Atlanta v. Glenn
87 S.E. 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Ga. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-savannah-v-hartridge-ga-1867.