Mayor of Savannah v. Centennial Mill Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mayor of Savannah v. Centennial Mill Co.

169 S.E. 40, 46 Ga. App. 725, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 214

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1933

Docket22726

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 S.E. 40 (Mayor of Savannah v. Centennial Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mayor of Savannah v. Centennial Mill Co., 169 S.E. 40, 46 Ga. App. 725, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. When a series of propositions are presented en bloc in a request to charge, the court 'is not required to give any part of the instructions so requested unless all are appropriate. Shippey v. Owens, 17 Ga. App. 127 (3) (86 S. E. 407). The court fully and fairly presented the issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence, and it was not error to refuse the request to charge, either in the form presented or in substance.

2. The second request to charge is not a correct statement of the law as applied to the facts of the present ease, and it was not error to refuse the same. The issue as to mutual or comparative fault or negligence is not involved.

3. The evidence fully supports the verdict, and has the approval of the trial judge; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI