Mayor of Rome v. Cabot

28 Ga. 50
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 28 Ga. 50 (Mayor of Rome v. Cabot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayor of Rome v. Cabot, 28 Ga. 50 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

Ought the injunction in this case to have been dissolved"

The answer fully denies all the special equity set up in the bill, and the only question left to be decided is — did the Mayor and Council have authority to make the contract to construct water-works for the benefit of the city? "We do not doubt it.

By the §13 of the charter, the Mayor and members of the Council, have special power to make all contracts in their corporate capacity which they may deem necessary [52]*52for the welfare of the city, which do not conflict with the constitution and laws of Georgia and the United States, “reference to which alone shall be had in the adjudications to be made upon this act,” — “ and to levy a tax for the fulfillment of the same.” Surely this grant is broad enough to cover this contract.

It is not shown or pretended, that a contract to construct water-works, so necessary to the health and security of the city, contravenes, either the constitution of the State, or of the Federal Government, or the laws thereof.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Moultrie v. Colquitt County Rural Electric Co.
89 S.E.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Scott v. Town of McIntyre
19 S.E.2d 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Town of McIntyre v. Baldwin
6 S.E.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Saunders v. Mayor of Arlington
94 S.E. 1022 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Hall v. Mayor of Calhoun
79 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
City of Joseph v. Joseph Water Works Co.
111 P. 864 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1910)
Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co. v. Columbus Waterworks Co.
130 F. 180 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1903)
City of Greenville v. Greenville Water Works Co.
125 Ala. 625 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
City Council v. Dawson Waterworks Co.
32 S.E. 907 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Webb City & Carterville Waterworks Co. v. City of Webb City
78 Mo. App. 422 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
Mayo v. Commissioners of Washington
40 L.R.A. 163 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
Grace v. Mayor of Hawkinsville
28 S.E. 1021 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Heilbron v. Mayor of Cuthbert
23 S.E. 206 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Conery v. New Orleans Water Works Co.
41 La. Ann. 910 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1889)
City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Gas-Light & Coke Co.
66 Ind. 396 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Adams v. Mayor of Rome
59 Ga. 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1877)
Smith v. City of Newbern
70 N.C. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Ga. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-rome-v-cabot-ga-1859.